The use of paper is not only an evocation of the voting process, but also a choice assumed in reference to the concept of fragility. The construction of walls is often the expression of our own fragility, of our fears. The purpose of the installation is also to question these affects. During my exhibitions, visitors invariably ask me if I am not afraid, afraid to let them touch/interact, afraid of risks...my answer is always the same: "The answer is in your question: I work on this fear and the behaviors it will induce in you towards the installation, what responsibilities will you take". I make the choice of trust, of this risk-taking and I put the fruit of long hours of lonely and manual work in your hands. What is our relationship to objects when we can put a face (personalize) the producer/creator, do we have more respect, more care. I consider the traces of interactions as part of the history of the work, as meaningful. My goal is to work not only on the notion of the wall/physical/real boundaries, but also psychic: where does a wall begin? At the first stone laid on the ground or already in our heads? Which of the two is the most limiting, the one that has the most consequences. When opening the boxes, the spectator is confronted with various elements: a mirror that sends back his own image, blood red because walls are often built in blood, a cloudy corner of the sky because weather/climate is not stopped by walls, the drawing of an eye as another point of view…